Legal Opinion

Segars v. Segars

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 5, 1983No. 0016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Justice:

This action was commenced by respondents Ray Segars, Jr. and R. V. Segars Company for specific performance of a contract and for an accounting. The issues on appeal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence as to respondents entitlement to specific performance, whether and in what quantity they were dispossessed of realty, the amount to which they are entitled in an accounting, including profits, the taxing of the costs of the action and the admissibility of certain evidence. This matter was tried before a master who found that appellant should be required to specifically…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Nauful v. MilliganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Rabb v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  4. South Orange Trust Co. v. CONNERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vandeventer v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. COSTA AND SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. LongCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Todd v. Bullard Funeral Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Robert L. Vandeventer, Duane D. Woodrow, and B. Legare Walpole, Jr. v. All American Life & Casualty Company N/K/A All American Life Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. Robert L. Vandeventer, Duane D. Woodrow, and B. Legare Walpole, Jr. v. All American Life & Casualty Company N/K/A All American Life Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API