Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Toys R US

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1996No. 99983, Calendar No. 2PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Victoria J. Lawrence was injured while working for Prompt Answering/DeBonte Electric. Her injury prevented her from continuing her employment with Prompt, but did not prevent her from continuing her dual employment at Plainfield Drive-In where, at the time of the injury, she had part-time seasonal employment in the sedentary job of selling movie tickets.

The questions presented are whether

• the wages Lawrence earned at Plainfield were properly included by the magistrate and the wcab in computing Lawrence’s “average weekly wage” for the purpose of determining the benefits payable to her;

*116•…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Midland Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pulley v. Detroit Engineering & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Michales v. Morton Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Buehler v. University of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. KaczmarekMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Smitter v. Thornapple TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Mattison v. Pontiac Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Bendion v. Penobscot Management Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API