Legal Opinion
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Apple
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 16, 2002No. 00-6030PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns certain obligations that the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 251 et seq.), (“the Act”), imposed on incumbent providers of local telephone service. Two of the Act’s obligations on incumbent service providers, such as Southwestern Bell (“SWBT”), are at issue in this ease: a resale duty and a duty to provide access to elements of the incumbent’s network. The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma found that an end-user limitation imposed by SWBT on its optional toll calling…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mci Telecommunication Corporation v. Bell Atlantic-PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Brooks Fiber Communications of Oklahoma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- WWC Holding Co., Inc. v. SopkinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- E.Spire Communications, Inc. v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated v. William D. MccartyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- E. Spire Communications, Inc. v. BacaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2003
- Qwest Corp. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.