Legal Opinion

KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN OF McALESTER v. SNELL

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 2014No. 110829PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WATT, J.;

€ 1 The issue before this Court is whether the Court of Civil Appeals (COCA) erred when it held the Legislature's enactment of 85 0.98.2011 § 840(D)(d) of the Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Code (WCC), 85 ©.8.2011, §§ 301-413, (now repealed), violated the Oklahoma Constitution's separation of powers provision, Art, IV, § 1. We hold in the affirmative.

T2 Respondent/claimant, Ben Snell, was employed by Petitioner/Employer, Kentucky Fried Chicken of McAlester. He alleged that on January 9, 2012, while at work, he slipped and fell while carrying a tray of chicken weighing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. HILL v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. PEOPLELINK, LLC. v. BEARSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. CoburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. MARSHALL COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API