Legal Opinion

Inserra v. Porto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 12, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified to provide that the denial of the motion to vacate the default, be with leave to renew upon proper papers, and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to respondent. Memorandum: Plaintiff has been granted a judgment in the amount of $3,591.50 in an action for malicious prosecution, following defendant’s default in answering or appearing in the action. Defendant thereafter movedlo vacate the judgment on the ground that the default was occasioned by the excusable neglect of his attorney, contending that an answer and notice of appearance had been prepared but that he had…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. BertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Polygon Co. v. Kotten Machine Co. of Brooklyn, Inc.Suffolk County District Court · 1980
  3. Fabre v. Damart Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999
  4. Jormar Construction Co. v. TinawiCivil Court of the City of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API