Legal Opinion
Baker v. LeBoeuf
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1997No. 94-3899PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs filed this action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The defendants moved to dismiss on grounds of improper venue. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3). The magistrate judge recommended that the motion be denied, Baker v. LeBoeuf, No. C-1-92-718,1993 WL 662352 (S.D.Ohio Oct. 7, 1993), and the district court denied the motion and certified the venue issue for immediate appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Now before us, the defendants contend that the district court should have dismissed this action for improper venue. This appeal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Roby v. Corp. of Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Dieter M. Hugel, Gulf Coast Marine, Incorporated, and Ocean Marine Indemnity Company v. The Corporation of Lloyd's, a United Kingdom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England v. James E. Layne Cindy Carol Kilgore, Larry Nig KilgoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baker v. Lamb, Leiby & MacRaeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Thorworks Industries v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008