In re the Opening of Orkney Street
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 198, Jan. T., 1899, by the city of Philadelphia, from judgment 'of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1898, No. 59, affirming order of Q. S. Phila. County, March T., 1897, sustaining exceptions to report of jury of view. Exceptions from report of viewers. Appeal from Superior Court. The facts as stated in the report of the case in 9 Pa.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 198, Jan. T., 1899, by the city of Philadelphia, from judgment 'of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1898, No. 59, affirming order of Q. S. Phila. County, March T., 1897, sustaining exceptions to report of jury of view. Exceptions from report of viewers. Appeal from Superior Court. The facts as stated in the report of the case in 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 604, are as follows: It appears from the record and evidence that a jury was appointed to consider the damages caused by reason of the opening of Orkney street from Ontario street to W estmoreland street. The jury filed a report, in which after…
1Opinion of the Court
Peb Cubiam,
We quite agree with the court of quarter sessions and the Superior Court in their disposition of this case. The opinion of the court is so thorough and exhaustive and so entirely correct that we can add nothing to it. W e affirm the order of the court below upon the opinion of the Superior Court.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Flynn v. HorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Kucker v. Sunlight Oil & Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Atlantic AvenueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Cooper v. Bellevue BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.