Legal Opinion
Cotton v. Federal Land Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 7, 1980No. 58329, 58330PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
Appellant asserts that the judgment below must be reversed because the trial court (1) failed to include findings of fact and conclusions of law in its judgment and (2) defined one of the terms of its judgment by nunc pro tunc order subsequent to the filing of a notice of appeal. We affirm.
On August 18, 1975, appellee filed separate complaints in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County seeking judgments upon which the foreclosure of two security deeds could be based. On September 18, 1975, appellant filed a copy of a petition for removal in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County. An…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. HatchettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Jackson v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- People v. BogartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Garber v. United Mine Workers of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Tri-State Culvert Manufacturing, Inc. v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cotton v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Cotton v. Federal Land Bank of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984