Legal Opinion

In re Lloyd

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. Sur register’s report, etc., upon the proofs of debt by creditors of Lloyd, Hamilton & Co.

1Opinion of the Court

Aoheson, T.

The question here is whether the creditors of Lloyd, Hamilton & Co., a banking Arm composed of Wm. M. Lloyd and Charles H. Hamilton, have the right to prove their debts against the estate of Wm. M. Lloyd, the bankrupt. Briefly, the facts are these: The bankrupt carried on the banking business individually at Al-toona, Pennsylvania, under the style of Wm. M. Lloyd & Co.; and at Ebensburg, Pennsylvania, under the style of Lloyd & Co.; and at the same time he carried on a distinct and separate banking business at New York city, with Charles H. Hamilton as his copartner, under the firm…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. In re CollierDistrict Court, D. Kentucky · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re WilcoxDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1899
  2. In re HendersonDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1906
  3. In re HullDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1915
  4. Shell Co. of California v. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API