In re Hull
District Court, N.D. Ohio
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Robert B. Hull, bankrupt. On petition of the Canton Buggy Company for review of decision of W. F. Kean, referee, denying the petitioner participation in distribution of the bankrupt’s estate.
1Opinion of the Court
KILUITS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the petition of the Canton Buggy Company, a creditor of the firm of Kyser-Hull Company, for a review of the order of distribution .declared by the referee, denying petitioner participation in the distribution of the estate of Robert B. Hull, bankrupt, a former member of the dissolved partnership.
The facts are these: An order of buggies was sold by the petitioner to one Kyser, doing business in his own name. Pending the delivery of the order, Kyser effected a partnership with Hull under the firm name of the Kyser-IIull Company, and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- Vaccaro v. Security BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- In re WilcoxDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1899
- In re L. Stein & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- In re JanesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- International Agr. Corp. v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- City Nat. Bank v. SlocumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Anderson v. Stayton State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Ft. Pitt Coal & Coke Co. v. DiserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917