Legal Opinion

Olery v. Brown

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

— The action, as appears by the body of the complaint, is evidently against the association of which Adam Brown is alleged to be president. The words “ and others” in the title may be regarded as immaterial; the body of the complaint should control the title.

By the act of April 1, 1849, any joint stock company or association consisting of seven or more shareholders, may sue and be sued in the name of the president thereof: and by the act of July 9, 1851, the previous act was so amended as to allow suits and proceedings to be brought and maintained, in the manner therein provided, against any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richards v. EdickNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  2. White v. BrownellNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1868
  3. Tibbetts v. Blood & TubbsNew York Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Screwmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. BensonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People ex rel. Keefe v. Women's Catholic Order of ForestersIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Levy v. Magnolia Lodge, No. 29, I. O. O. F.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Young v. EamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Loubat v. Le RoyNew York Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API