Legal Opinion

Richards v. Edick

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1853PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Demurrer to the first and second Counts of the complaint. The opinion states all the material facts and questions.

1Opinion of the CourtGridley, J.

This is a demurrer, separately taken to the two first counts of the complaint, upon several grounds, all of *262which may be classed under the sixth subdivision of section 144 of the code. Although these grounds of objection are stated as special causes of demurrer, yet, unless they are such as show that the counts respectively do not contain facts enough to constitute a cause of action', they, cannot be regarded, on this árgument. Defects merely formal, and which, under the former practice, were the appropriate subjects of a special demurrer, cannot now be reached and corrected by this form of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Baldwin v. MunnNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Green v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  4. Hasbrouck v. TappenNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  5. Shiell v. M'NittNew York Court of Chancery · 1841

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Marks v. . CowdinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Benedict v. . PincusNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. In re the Arbitration between Publishers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API