Legal Opinion
Ruttenberg v. Dine
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 6, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
On November 2,1949, the defendant in error, referred to herein as the landlord, instituted a summary process action against the plaintiff in error, referred to herein as the tenant, to recover possession of premises at 23 Mead Street, New Haven. The action was returnable to the City Court of New Haven on the fourth Tuesday of the month, which was November 22, 1949. On November 29, the tenant, as appears *18by a correction of the bill of exceptions made by the City Court after the record was printed, filed a motion for a trial by jury. The motion was denied without memorandum. Thereafter, an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Thompson v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Anderson v. LehmkuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Norwich v. Norwalk Wilbert Vault Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Mac-Aire Aviation Corp. v. Corporate Air, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1970
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015