Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Main

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 30, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The justice court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for a jury trial. The statute gave either party the right to move for a jury “on or before the return day of such complaint.” The defendant did not so move until sixteen days thereafter. He claimed this right because the complaint had been permitted to be amended by leave of court on June 14th, by alleging an additional ground of recovery concerning whose allegations he had had no opportunity to claim a jury trial. The original complaint of summary process alleged a tenancy terminable at the option of the lessor; the amendment to the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cashman v. Meriden HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Leahey v. HeasleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Nowey v. KravitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. State v. Giant's Neck Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Beach v. Beach Hotel CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API