Legal Opinion

Witham v. Osburn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Benton County. This was a suit to enjoin appellant from opening a private road across the land of respondent. The injunction was granted, and appellant brings his appeal. The other material facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Prim, J.:

It is provided by our statute that when any person’s land shall be so situated that it has no connection with any public road, he may make application to the County Court for the location of a private road leading from his premises to some convenient public road. When such application is made, the Court shall appoint three disinterested house*321holders to view out and locate such road according to the application; and also to assess and report the damages which may be sustained by the persons over whose lands such road may be located. After three days’ notice given to all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Beekman v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Varick v. Smith & The Attorney GeneralNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  4. Sherman v. BuickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of O'ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Smith v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Saunders v. Titus County Fresh Water Supply District No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Latah County v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API