Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided September 19, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Willie Hardy State Representative 518 Warner Street Camden, AR 71701

Dear Representative Hardy:

I am writing in response to your request for an opinion on the following:

May a First-Class city's elected (`part time') City Attorney legally work full time as a State attorney/employee for the Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement (or at another non-elected State job), if fulfilling the duties of both employments does not interfere or conflict with either employment, or with either entity's employee policies?

NOTE: If elective office duties occasionally arise during normal State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tappan v. Helena Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Van Hovenberg v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Thompson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Bloom v. KeithlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API