Legal Opinion

In Re Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided July 10, 2009No. 4:08-cv-02004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CLAY D. LAND, District Judge.

These actions arise from complications Plaintiffs suffered after they were surgically implanted with ObTape, a product sold by Defendant Mentor Corporation and designed to treat stress urinary incontinence. Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Identified in Defendant’s Privilege Log for French Documents (Doc. 48). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs’ presently pending motion to compel stems from documents received from France…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Capital One Bank Credit Card Interest Rate LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
  2. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. TrowbridgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API