United States v. Gambino
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
The defendants have made motions in limine which, if granted would, (1) restrict the government’s use of expert testimony; (2) preclude the admission into evidence of Count One of Anthony Megale’s Connecticut indictment together with portions of the government’s proffer made in connection with Mr. Megale’s guilty plea; and (3) permit the defendants to introduce proof of Thomas Gambino’s prior federal acquittal.
The government has also made such a motion which, if granted would, (1) limit the cross-examination of Salvatore Gravano as will be hereafter…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. KopitukCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. TutinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Frank Viserto, Jr., Richard Rocco, Joseph Solce, Garnet Johnson, Sarah Payne, Howard Williams and Prentiss CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Napout Et. AnoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Holloway v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. BellomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. TomeroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007