Legal Opinion

United States v. Gambino

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 15, 1993No. CR-90-1051 (S-3)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge:

The defendants have made motions in limine which, if granted would, (1) restrict the government’s use of expert testimony; (2) preclude the admission into evidence of Count One of Anthony Megale’s Connecticut indictment together with portions of the government’s proffer made in connection with Mr. Megale’s guilty plea; and (3) permit the defendants to introduce proof of Thomas Gambino’s prior federal acquittal.

The government has also made such a motion which, if granted would, (1) limit the cross-examination of Salvatore Gravano as will be hereafter…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. KopitukCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. TutinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Frank Viserto, Jr., Richard Rocco, Joseph Solce, Garnet Johnson, Sarah Payne, Howard Williams and Prentiss CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Napout Et. AnoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. Holloway v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
  4. United States v. BellomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. United States v. TomeroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API