Legal Opinion
Widener v. Arco Oil and Gas Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided May 23, 1989No. Civ. A. 3-88-0634-TPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SETTING JURY TRIAL ON DAMAGES
MALONEY, District Judge.
On October 17, 1988, Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs filed their response on December 23, 1988 and their supplemental response on January 4, 1989. Defendant filed its reply on January 31, 1989.. BACKGROUND
This action was brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, (“ADEA”). Prior to their termination Widener and Mozumder were employed as geophysicists. On March 31, 1986, both Plaintiffs were given a letter placing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cosmair, Inc., L'OreaL Hair Care DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Richard Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Williams v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Bunnett v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- The Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc. v. David Dworkin, David Dworkin v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc., Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Dalo v. KivitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Laura K. Grillet, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.