Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bucio.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2017No. 2017-0800PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

*126 {¶ 1} Respondent, Christopher Ramon Bucio, of Urbana, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0076517, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2003. In January 2017, we suspended Bucio's license on an interim basis after receiving notice of his felony conviction for unauthorized use of a client's property in violation of R.C. 2913.04. In re Bucio , 149 Ohio St.3d 1243 , 2017-Ohio-29 , 75 N.E.3d 1257 .

{¶ 2} In 2015, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Bucio with professional misconduct based on the facts that led to his felony conviction. Bucio stipulated to most of the charges against him,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. PetersonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In re BucioOhio Supreme Court · 2017

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BucioOhio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BucioOhio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FuscoOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Demond Liles v. V. Michael FisherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BucioOhio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API