Legal Opinion

People v. Hamil

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1974No. 58879, 59325 consPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hallett

deEvered the opinion of the court:

We have here appeals in two separate and yet related proceedings involving the same individual and they have been consoEdated on his motion.

No. 58879

In No. 58879, Roy Lee Hamil, who was then under indictment for rape, attempt rape, robbery, etc., involving four females, two of them under age, was charged in a petition filed in 1966 in those cases, with being a “sexually dangerous person” under “An Act relating to sexually dangerous persons and providing for their commitment, detention and supervision,” approved July 6, 1938, as amended (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. AmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. The PEOPLE v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. The PEOPLE v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. BishopIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. HillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. McVeayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. People v. F. L. W.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. People v. ShelbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. People v. KittleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API