Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 14, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00216Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON RAMON BOYCE, Petitioner, : Case No. 3:21-cv-216 - vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz TIM SHOOP, Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, : Respondent. SUBSTITUTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by Petitioner Ramon Boyce under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the Court for decision on the merits. The Petition was filed August 9, 2021 (ECF No. 1, PageID 1). The Court completed initial screening under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing §…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API