Legal Opinion

Goode v. Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1989PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FONES, Justice.

This is a products liability case wherein plaintiff claims he contracted a skin pigmentation condition diagnosed as vitiligo, as a result of using asphalt roof shingles and felt manufactured by defendants. No warning label alerting users of any potential danger appeared on the shingles or felt.

At the close of all the proof the trial judge granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict on the ground that there was no proof that the roofing products manufactured by defendants were either defective or unreasonably dangerous under the Tennessee Products Liability Act, T.C.A. §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crosslin v. AlsupTennessee Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Benton v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Loeffler v. KjellgrenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. Smith v. Inman Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Edward Brown, Quebecor, Inc., Intervening v. The Raymond CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Pettus v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API