Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. Enterprise Wall Paper Mfg. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1942No. 2768PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon motion of the defendants to vacate an order appointing temporary receivers for the Enterprise Wall Paper Manufacturing Company. The appointment was made ex parte upon the facts alleged under oath in the bill of complaint filed, the affidavit of Marie A. Walsh in support of the application, and on motion of complainant’s counsel.
Defendants’ motion to vacate is based upon the contentions that (1) the plaintiff has no standing to bring this action because he has failed to first demand redress through the corporate directors or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Doctor v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lerman v. ITB Management Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973
- Slotsky v. Gellar, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1969