Legal Opinion
In Re Quality Stores, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 31, 2003No. 19-02576PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING TREATMENT OF DISPUTED RECLAMATION CLAIMS
JAMES D. GREGG, Chief Judge.
I. ISSUES
Under the facts of this contested matter, do certain reclamation claimants hold valid liens or administrative claims to be paid under the terms of a confirmed chapter 11 plan? Is the Debtor estopped from challenging the treatment of those reclamation claims?
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The court has jurisdiction over the case and this contested matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1384. This case and all related matters have been referred to this court by the United States District Court for the Western…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 68,272 Gail Spilman v. Darryl M. HarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Dana Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corp. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. (In Re Pittsburgh-Canfield Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Nitram, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- InRe: Pittsburgh-Can v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corp. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. (In Re Pittsburgh-Canfield Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004