Brooklyn Trust Co. v. Smart
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFurman, J.
Obviously it was the intention of the incompetent to use the proceeds of the account in question for the support and maintenance of her daughter. However, the act of creating the account coupled with such intention, standing alone, does not constitute sufficient evidence to warrant the court in declaring an irrevocable trust. There does not appear to be any other affirmative act or declaration on the part of the incompetent which would tend to denote, that she intended to make it irrevocable. On the contrary, it is my opinion that a tentative trust was created. This is borne out by the fact…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Rickel v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- In Re Guardianship of OverpeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Toledo Trust Co. v. National Bank of DetroitOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Final Accounting of BorowskiNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- In re PalyoNew York Supreme Court · 1946