Legal Opinion

Henry v. . Allen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1895PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The nature of the proceeding is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.

The appellant moves for an order directing that the return herein be transmitted to the Supreme Court, and that this case be remanded there, without prejudice to the appeal to this court heretofore taken, for the purpose of enabling him to move for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence.

We deny this motion for the reason that the pendency of the appeal is no bar to a motion in the court below for a new trial. We have heretofore pointed out that upon an appeal to this court the record itself is not transmitted to us, but a transcript thereof, and the case for all general…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Hoffman v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ruben v. American & Foreign InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Cupo v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. In Re AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. Chambliss v. HassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Waldo v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API