Legal Opinion

Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 8, 1959No. 141-57Published

1Opinion of the Court

172 F.Supp. 454 (1959)

BATESON-STOLTE, INC.,

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 141-57.

United States Court of Claims.

April 8, 1959.

John L. Kilcullen, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. O. P. Easterwood, Jr., and McNutt, Dudley & Easterwood, Washington, D. C., were on the briefs.

Clare E. Walker, New York City, with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. George Cochran Doub, for defendant.

WHITAKER, Judge.

This is a suit for $193,637.95 in additional expenses incurred by plaintiff in the performance of a Government contract. The defendant has moved the court for judgment on the pleadings dismissing plaintiff's petition on the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  5. Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API