Legal Opinion

Ogletree v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 7, 2009No. A09A0929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Stacey Ogletree appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss based upon an alleged violation of the prohibition *366against double jeopardy. In his sole enumeration of error, Ogletree contends that double jeopardy barred his subsequent prosecution because the trial court’s grant of a mistrial in the first proceeding was not manifestly necessary and therefore erroneous. We disagree and affirm.

The Georgia Constitution provides that “no person shall be put in jeopardy of life or liberty more than once for the same offense except when a new trial has been…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Laster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Tubbs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Spearman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Ogletree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Julian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Honester v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API