Jackson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Senior Appellate Judge.
Renado Jackson appeals from the denial of his motion for discharge and acquittal, arguing that the trial court erred in declaring a mistrial, over Jackson’s objection, based on the State’s failure to subpoena its only two material witnesses. We agree and reverse.
“The appellate standard of review of a grant or denial of a double jeopardy plea in bar is whether, after reviewing the trial court’s oral and written rulings as a whole, the trial court’s [factual] findings support its [legal] conclusion.” (Punctuation omitted.) Puplampu v. State. See also Burdett v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Laster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Julian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- The State v. GraysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Russell E. Julian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013