Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 27, 2010No. A10A1735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Senior Appellate Judge.

Renado Jackson appeals from the denial of his motion for discharge and acquittal, arguing that the trial court erred in declaring a mistrial, over Jackson’s objection, based on the State’s failure to subpoena its only two material witnesses. We agree and reverse.

“The appellate standard of review of a grant or denial of a double jeopardy plea in bar is whether, after reviewing the trial court’s oral and written rulings as a whole, the trial court’s [factual] findings support its [legal] conclusion.” (Punctuation omitted.) Puplampu v. State. See also Burdett v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Laster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Julian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. The State v. GraysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  3. Russell E. Julian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API