Legal Opinion

Geldert v. Usher

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The plaintiff alleges in her bill that on December 18, 1914, she conveyed certain real estate to one Hartshorn, by an instrument in writing which contained this provision: “ This deed is given to the grantee subject to a mortgage assigned to said William N. Hartshorn, which mortgage is still to remain in force' as if- this deed had not been given, except that any sum received from rents or income, or from any other source from this estate, above expenses and charges, together with any amounts expended in repairs shall be deducted from the amount due on mortgage note given to Thomas Arnold and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bremer v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Nashua Savings Bank v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Hall & Co. v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  4. Ela v. ElaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Nathan Miller & Sons, Ltd. v. BlinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stoneham Five Cents Savings Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Ballentine v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Ginzberg v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Department of Public Welfare v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. State National Bank v. Beacon Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API