Legal Opinion

Nathan Miller & Sons, Ltd. v. Blinn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

These are appeals from decrees enjoining the foreclosure of a mortgage at the suit of subsequent attaching creditors. The mortgagor was a manufacturing corporation; the mortgagees were eight persons who were in fact directors of the mortgagor corporation. The condition of the mortgage was, in substance, to hold and save harmless the “grantees and each of them,” in respect of indorsements thereafter made by them on promissory notes of the mortgagor. A copy of the condition is given below in a note.*

Later, the eight mortgagees indorsed two notes, given by the mortgagor to the Massasoit-Pocasset…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Haskins v. HawkesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lamson & Co. v. AbramsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. United States Trust Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Geldert v. UsherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Brown v. General Trading Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Boothby v. DezotellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API