Legal Opinion

In re Cauley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 23, 2014No. 12-14-00028-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIAN HOYLE, Justice.

By petition for writ of mandamus, Phil Cauley challenges the trial court’s order granting presuit discovery.1 The real party in interest is Efficien Technology, L.L.C. We conditionally grant the petition.

Background

Efficien is the successor in interest to Natural Resource Recovery, Inc. (NRR), and Cauley is a former employee of NRR. While working at NRR, Cauley helped develop a product identified as a “carbonator.” Cauley assigned NRR his rights to the intellectual property related to the car-bonator.

Since he left NRR’s employment, Cauley and NRR have had…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re BassTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. in Re Olshan Foundation Repair Company, LLC and Olshan Foundation Repair Company of Dallas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. in Re: City of Tatum, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018
  2. in Re: City of Tatum, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2019
  3. Hunter Bend Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Victoria GrimesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2025
  4. In Re Daniel A. Hunt v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2024
  5. In the Interest of M.M., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API