Legal Opinion

Gwinnett Commercial Bank v. Kalb

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1980No. 36260PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case on the question of whether or not certain evidence in defense of a suit on a note was barred by the parol evidence rule. The Court of Appeals held the evidence admissible. Kalb v. Gwinnett Commercial Bank, 153 Ga. App. 833 (267 SE2d 258) (1980). In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals relied on their ruling in Henry v. Cobb Bank &c. Co., 151 Ga. App. 725 (261 SE2d 459) (1979).

This court granted certiorari and reversed the decision in Henry in Cobb Bank &c. Co. v. Henry, 246 Ga. 225 (1980). Since the issues raised in this appeal are the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cobb Bank & Trust Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Henry v. Cobb Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Kalb v. Gwinnett Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kalb v. Gwinnett Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Mann Investment Co. v. Columbia Nitrogen Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Mann Investment Co. v. Columbia Nitrogen Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API