Legal Opinion

Kalb v. Gwinnett Commercial Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1980No. 58406PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

This is a suit upon a promissory note assigned by the payee, Bentley, to the appellee bank. Appellants, makers of the note, contend that it was error for the trial court to grant summary judgment to the bank because there was a genuine issue as to whether the bank was a holder in due course so as to take the instrument free of defenses which Bentley might have. We agree.

The promissory note in issue states on its face that it is "non-negotiable.” We considered an identical note in Henry v. Cobb Bank &c. Co., 151 Ga. App. 725 (1979), which is controlling here. In that case we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henry v. Cobb Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gwinnett Commercial Bank v. KalbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Kalb v. Gwinnett Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API