Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Clausen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1936No. Civ. 1617PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOVEL, J., pro tem.

For the purpose of this appeal the land involved may be considered as the east half of lot 1 in block 23 at Palm Springs, in Riverside County. In 1890, title to all of lot 1 was vested in Benjamin Browning. In 1891, he deeded the west half of lot 1 to S. A. Wood. On November 29, 1901, Browning deeded the west half of lot 1 to plaintiff. Plaintiff testified that in the year 1904 Browning told him that he should have conveyed to plaintiff the east half of lot 1 and that the 1901 deed was erroneous. Plaintiff’s secretary prepared a new deed which Browning signed and recorded,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Conlin v. BlanchardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of McSweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Estate of AuslenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Barrett v. SteeleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Sweeney v. WelteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Estate of AuslenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API