Legal Opinion
Chull Wook Kim v. Harry B. Cochenour
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 27, 1982No. 80-2353PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a dismissal of a complaint for failure to present the claims contained in the complaint to the bankrupt-, cy court. Because we hold that the claims asserted were not provable under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 (“the Act”), 1 we reverse.
I
On April 18, 1979, Chull Wook Kim filed a three-count complaint against Harry B. Cochenour, Eunice Cochenour, and Diversified Cleaning Services, Inc. (“Diversified”). 2 Count I of the complaint alleged that Harry Cochenour, the principal officer of Diversified, had committed fraudulent acts and misrepresented or omitted to state material…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Thompson Trawlers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Thompson Trawlers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Nutek Information Systems, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Pfohl v. Pelican LandingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.