Lasser v. Philadelphia National Bank
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
Plaintiff seeks, in this action of assumpsit, to recover the sum of $4,085, alleged to have been had and received by defendant to plaintiff’s use. At the trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, but the court below entered judgment for defendant n. o. v., whereupon plaintiff appealed.
The facts follow: Wright Metal, Inc., is a fabricator of metal office partitions; it now operates under an assignment for benefit of creditors. In 1930, this company (hereinafter referred to as Wright) entered into an agreement with David Lupton Sons & Company of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Connor v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Collins's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Newman v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Mott v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. National Bank of Germantown & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cancilla v. BondySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Fiberchem, Inc. v. General Plastics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- In re Leader Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Canter v. CanterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Fiberchem, Inc. v. General Plastics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.