Legal Opinion

Lasser v. Philadelphia National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1936No. Appeal, 380PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

Plaintiff seeks, in this action of assumpsit, to recover the sum of $4,085, alleged to have been had and received by defendant to plaintiff’s use. At the trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, but the court below entered judgment for defendant n. o. v., whereupon plaintiff appealed.

The facts follow: Wright Metal, Inc., is a fabricator of metal office partitions; it now operates under an assignment for benefit of creditors. In 1930, this company (hereinafter referred to as Wright) entered into an agreement with David Lupton Sons & Company of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Collins's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Newman v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Mott v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. National Bank of Germantown & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cancilla v. BondySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Fiberchem, Inc. v. General Plastics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. In re Leader Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Canter v. CanterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Fiberchem, Inc. v. General Plastics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API