Arnold v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
STECKLER, Chief Judge.
This cause came on for trial before the court on December 9, 1957. At the conclusion of all the evidence on December 10,1957, the court directed the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff. Since the decision which prompted the court to direct a verdict for the plaintiff has aroused considerable interest on the part of the Indiana bar in general, due to the absence of clear, succinct decisions of Indiana courts on the precise legal issues involved, the court has deemed it advisable to set out at some length the reasoning which underlay said decision.
A brief summary of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Vezolles v. Home Indemnity Co., New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Horace A. Arnold, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Eugene Arnold v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Automobile Underwriters, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1966