Legal Opinion
Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Scott E's Pub, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 15, 2001No. 00-C-0763PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. filed this ease against Scott E’s Pub, Inc. d/b/a Scott E’s Pub (I’ll refer to the physical establishment as the “Pub”), Charles Spahn, and Neal Altmann, alleging that the defendant pub wrongfully intercepted the June 28, 1997 boxing match between Evander Holyfield and Mike Tyson without paying the requisite licensing fees. I granted default judgment against Scott E’s Pub, Inc. back on September 29, 2000. At a status conference of February 14, 2001, Kingvision and Altmann agreed to Kingvision’s voluntary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Contreras v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. William C. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- On/tv of Chicago v. Archie Ward JulienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Morelia Mexican Restaurant, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 152 Bronx, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd. v. LalaleoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- DirecTV, Inc. v. SchulienDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- DirecTV, Inc. v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.