Legal Opinion
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 7, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01221Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX DIVISION LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL No. 2:22-cv-01221-MWM ADMISSION, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants. MOSMAN, J., LFRA’s Complaint challenges “the categorical bar admission local rules in the Ninth Circuit for experienced sister-state attorneys in good standing.” Am. Compl. [ECF 64] § 23. Each district court in the Ninth Circuit has a local rule requiring an attorney admitted to practice in district court to be a member in good standing of the state bar of the forum state…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.