Legal Opinion
Elwyn v. De Garmendia
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 9, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
|Boxd, C. L|
delivered the opinion of the Court.
^The case is that in 1913 the testatrix made a will which contained a legacy to the petitioner of “one string of my pearls,” and a legacy to a Mrs. Bojestvensky of “the second string of my pearls,” and at the time of her death in 1923 she had all her pearls combined in one string or collar. And in a form of will prepared by the testatrix in the year 1922, but never executed (see In re de Garmendia Estate, 146 Md. 47), she omitted the legacies of pearls to Mrs. Elwyn and Mrs. Bojestvensky, and to the form of bequest to her sister, Mrs. Von…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BrannNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Walton v. WaltonNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
- Gardner v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Ayre v. HixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Pope v. HinckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dessommes v. DessommesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- YIVO Institute for Jewish Research v. ZaleskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Willis v. BarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- In Re Estate of KeelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- In Re Barrows' EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.