Muldrow v. Surrex Solutions Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AARON, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
In this appeal from a judgment after a bench trial, we consider two issues. First, we address whether the trial court erred in determining that an *1384employer was not required to pay overtime wages (Lab. Code, § 510)1 to a class of its current and former employees because they were subject to the commissioned employees exemption (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11070, subd. 3(D)). Pursuant to this exemption, employers are not required to pay overtime wages to employees “whose earnings exceed one and one-half (1 1/2) times the minimum wage if more than half of that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Jaimez v. Daiohs USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cicairos v. Summit Logistics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Dong Yi and Edgar Martinez, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sterling Collision Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Balasanyan v. Nordstrom, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Hammitt v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Naranjo v. Doctors Medical Ctr. of Modesto, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Richardson v. Ruan Transport Corp. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020