Legal Opinion

Hammitt v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 13, 2014No. Case No. 12cv1730-GPC(JMA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Hammitt (“Plaintiff”) brings this action for damages against Defendant Lumber Liquidators, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Lumber Liquidators”) for denial of overtime wages and meal breaks under California wage and hour laws, failure to reimburse necessary business expenses, *992and unfair business practices. (Dkt. No. 1.) Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all causes of action alleged in Plaintiffs Complaint. (Dkt. No. 58.) The parties…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arizona Recovery Housing Association v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  2. Byelick v. Ryvyl Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
  3. Cullen v. Ryvyl Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
  4. Next Step Advisors LLC v. True Harvest LLC LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  5. Turner v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API