Legal Opinion

East Texas Public Service Co. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1927No. 3437. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The court refused appellant’s requested peremptory instruction, and submitted the case to the jury on special issues. The appellant’s objections thereto in pertinent propositions are, in effect, that (1) actionable negligence was not shown in the circumstances of the case; (2) the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, as a matter of pure law; (3) special issues Nos. 1, 2, and 3 were each erroneous upon the special grounds enumerated. Issues Nos. 1; 2, and 3, in effect and substance, are as follows:(1)Whether or not the electric company by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Moore v. IveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. LefevreTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. City of Greenville v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas Utilities Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. East Texas Public Service Co. v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. East Texas Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API