Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. East Texas Public Service Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1931No. 5914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This was tort action begun by R. E. John-son against Company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him as a result of his coming into contact with a cable which was heavily charged with electricity. The cable was used b the service company £or the purpose of raising and lowering an eleetric light at a street intersection, and was not designed or intended as a conductor of electrie current. But it had become charged with electricity as a result of the cutting or breaking of a guy wire which theretofore had been , , Va. • , , fastened by the service company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. City of San Antonio v. TalericoTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Astoria v. Astoria & Columbia River R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Coates v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951
  3. Brown & Root, Inc. v. United States. United States v. Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Coates v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API