Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Lovette

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1996No. COA95-209PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

We first note that plaintiff argues this appeal should be dismissed because defendant did not order the transcript of the evidence within the time allowed by Rule 7 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. Plaintiff first made this motion in superior court; the superior court denied plaintiffs motion. The denial is not the subject of an assignment of error here. Accordingly, this issue is not before us.

I

Defendant argues that the superior court exceeded its authority under G.S. 97-10.2 when it ordered disbursement of the funds paid by Integon. G.S. 97-10.2(g) provides…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Group v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Bailey v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Buckner v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. DitilloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Childress v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. DitilloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API