Attorney General v. Joy
Michigan Supreme Court
Quo warranto proceedings by Jacob J. Van Riper, Attorney General, against James F. Joy and others to determine the right of the respondents to exercise the corporate privileges and franchises of the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company. On motion for rehearing.
1Per curiam
Primarily this is a petition for rehearing in the above-entitled cause,'filed by Roger I. Wykes, attorney general, on December 30, 1912. It consists of a printed volume containing 192 pages. Petitioner also asks that, if for any reason a rehearing cannot be granted, permission be given to file an original bill of review to present the questions outlined in the petition.
This case, now sought to be opened, is a quo warranto proceeding and was decided nearly 30 years ago, in 1884, being reported in 55 Mich. 94 (20 N. W. 806), where it occupies .12 pages of the printed record. The opinion is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Powers v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Attorney General v. JoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Detroit, G. H. & M. Ry. Co. v. FullerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Johnson v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951