McCue v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in this case, and then an amended motion, a brief and argument on the motion, and a supplemental argument, in which a number of the questions involved are ably presented, yet in some parts of the argument expressions are used that are not in accord with their high standing as lawyers, such as intimations that the court may not read the argument, and they take one expression, "The question presented by the record is, was appellant one of the participants in the crime," and while in their original brief and in the briefs and arguments filed on this…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Kugadt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Newcomb v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
- King v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
- McGrath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.