Legal Opinion

Ward v. Lattimer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1847PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of the court, delivered by Mr. Justice Lipsoomb.

1Opinion of the CourtLipscoMb, J.

This action was brought in the district court for the county of Bed Biver, by the defendants in error, against the plaintiffs, on two notes in writing under seal, as follows, i. e.:

One day after date, we promise to pay Lattimer, Bagby & Co., or order, four hundred and sixty-four dollars and twenty-*246nine cents in cash notes due since the first day of January, 1845, for value received of them. Witness, our hands and seals, this 17th February, 1845. (Signed)

¥i. Waed, [l. s.]

B. H. MaetiN. [l. s.]

Received on the within note, sixty-nine dollars and nine cents. April 12, 1845. (Signed)

Lattimee, Bagby…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hunt's Heirs v. Ellison's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Lauderdale v. R. & T. A. Ennis Stationery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Becker v. HolmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Anders v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Shaw v. SchuchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API